Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Southern Brokerage Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1969No. B-1439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Justice.

In this suit by Southern Brokerage Company, plaintiff, to recover from The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, defendant, a sum of money expended by the plaintiff as attorneys’ fees and court costs in defending a prior suit against it, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and rendered judgment that plaintiff take nothing. The court of civil appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment and rendered judgment for Southern on its motion for summary judgment. 437 S.W.2d 316. We reverse the judgment of the court of civil appeals and affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. National Surety Corp. v. First National Bank of MidlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Southern Brokerage Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Continental Corporation v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. The First National Bank of Bowie v. The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. White Rock National Bank of Dallas v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API