Rome S. Amp S. Station v. Finch
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtpeld, J.,
This is an appeal by defendant from the refusal of the court below to grant a rule to show cause why a judgment entered against it should not be- stricken off.
The judgment was entered pursuant to a warrant of attorney contained in a written agreement, dated the 7th day of June, 1932, executed between “Rome Sales & Service Station” by H. "W. Dimon, Prop., Lessor, and "Walter Pinch, Lessee, under which “undersigned” lessor does lease and “undersigned” lessee does hire one 1929 Chevrolet truck for a total rental of $336, payable $95 on or before delivery, and $241 in…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Rome Sales & Service Station v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Ross v. McMillanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Redington Hotel v. GuffeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.