Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Vineyard
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOODWARD, District Judge.
The above entitled and numbered cause was called for trial on the 18th day of May, 1972, with plaintiff’s representative and defendant both present and represented by counsel. The parties announced ready for trial, and the issues of fact and law were presented to the Court without a jury.
Upon conclusion of the testimony and the arguments of counsel, the Court directed that counsel file additional statements and briefs. After considering the entire record in this case, the Court is of the opinion, as hereinafter stated, that plaintiff should recover…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. RectenwallDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1951
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Investors Associates X., Ltd. And Milton A. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. AbrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Eagle Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1985
- Dasco, Inc. v. American City Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Martinez AlmodovarDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.