Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. St. Louis, K. & N. W. R. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided October 14, 1902No. 4,439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

At Law. On demurrer to answer.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiff who was a servant in the employ of the defendant company to recover damages for alleged negligence. The defendant pleads as an *93affirmative defense that prior to the time of the accident complained of the defendant organized a “Relief Department” contemplating the creation of a fund by voluntary contributions of its employés and by appropriations made and to be made by itself for the purpose of paying to the members contributing thereto, certain benefits in case of sickness or disability resulting from injury while in defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Johnson v. Philadelphia & Reading R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Donald v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Maine v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. DunningCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
  3. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CarmodyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Day v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
  5. Barden v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API