Legal Opinion

Keys v. Keys

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether a grant in a deed of a possible future., interest in the land described in the deed operates as a contract, which can be specifically enforced in equity, to convey said interest when acquired.

The testimony, which is undisputed, discloses that Charles M. Keys died intestate in 1874, seised and possessed of a hundred and fifty acre farm in Montgomery County, and leaving surviving him his widow, Martha A. Keys, and ten children, four of these children being the offspring of his first wife, and the other six being the children of his widow.

By…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cooke v. HusbandsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  2. Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  3. Schapiro v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  4. Clendening v. WyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Jackson ex dem. Thurman v. BradfordNew York Supreme Court · 1830

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Newburyport Society for the Relief of Aged Women v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Summers v. FreishtatCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Douglas v. LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Scott v. First Nat. Bank, Adm.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API