Legal Opinion

Lee v. Burnett, 07ap-40 (7-24-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2007No. 07AP-40PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Raymond T. Lee, III, plaintiff-appellant, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which the court sustained the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, alternatively, for forum non conveniens, filed by Elizabeth Burnett, Greg Tompkins, and G. Patrick Connors, III, defendants-appellees.

{¶ 2} According to appellant's complaint, in September 2000, appellant and Burnett commenced a romantic affair in San Diego, California. Appellant was married and, after disclosing his affair to his spouse, appellant, his spouse, and their children…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Omans v. Norfolk Southern RailwayOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dahlhausen v. AldredOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Patel v. Patel, 06ap-1260 (11-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Epperson v. Covington Madison Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API