Legal Opinion

Leitstein v. Capital Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 2, 1938No. 6473PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

Upon a certificate for contempt issued by the referee in bankruptcy, the District Court issued a rule to show cause why the appellant, Leitstein, should not be' adjudged in contempt of court because he had refused: (1) To answer certain questions asked him in a hearing before the' referee under section 21a of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 44 (a); (2) to permit certain pages of the cashbook of All Continent Corporation, hereinafter called All Continent, to be marked in evidence; (3) to open the book Exhibit P-31, at page 26; and (4) to permit counsel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Brownson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Freeman v. SeligsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. Fox v. Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. HaggertyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. Dufenhorst v. AitkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API