Legal Opinion
Lentz v. Mason
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 14, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2319PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge:
Plaintiffs, Robert and Mary Lentz, filed this action against Fox & Lazo, Inc., a real estate broker, and one of its agents, Cathie Galanti (“Galanti”), among others. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges causes of action based upon the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, and the statutory and common law of New Jersey. Based upon the CERCLA claims, this court’s jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state law claims is predicated upon 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mark v. Borough of HatboroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lentz v. MasonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- United States v. ManzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- In Re Tutu Wells Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1998
- United States v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rothman v. City of NorthfieldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.