Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 10, 2020No. SC20244Published

1Opinion of the Court

Page 50 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL March 10, 2020 870 MARCH, 2020

334 Conn. 870

Dickerson v. Stamford GEORGE R. DICKERSON v. CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL. (SC 20244) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus The named defendant, the city of Stamford, appealed from the decision of the Compensation Review Board, which vacated the Workers’ Compen- sation Commissioner’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s claim for benefits under the statute (§ 7-433c) governing compensation for municipal police officers or firefighters with hypertension or heart disease. In 2000, while…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. SAPKO v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  3. Felia v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Birnie v. Electric Boat Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Lambert v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API