North Carolina State Bar v. Key
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Because there was substantial evidence from which the Disciplinary Hearing Commission of the North Carolina State Bar could conclude that defendant violated N.C. Rev. R. Prof. Conduct 1.16, 1.3, and 8.4 in violation of the terms of a 2003 Consent Order of Discipline, we affirm the Disciplinary Hearing Commission.
I: Procedural History
On 9 December 2005, the North Carolina State Bar (“Bar”) filed a motion for Order to Show Cause against defendant Mark Anthony Key (“Key”), alleging that Key had failed to comply with a 2003 Consent Order of Discipline by violating the North…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.