Legal Opinion

Dyer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1909No. 2184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictments for malpractice in office; from Hall superior court —Judge Kimsey. September 16, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

The plaintiffs in error were indicted, as members of the board of commissioners of roads and revenues of Hall county, for malpractice in office. The only question raised for our determination by the present record is whether such officers are entitled, before indictment, to notice of the charges against them, by service of a copy of the proposed accusation, and to an opportunity of being heard in their own defense. We think that there can be no question that the plaintiffs in error were entitled to notice and a hearing upon the charge of malpractice in office. As officers they were acting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DeasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. James C. Sweeney v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API