Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Hobbs
I respectfully dissent. The hearing officer, in my view, incorrectly determined that no ambiguity existed in regard to the disputed language of section 5.07 of the contract and ruled as inadmissible the concessionaires' evidence to the contrary. The language states: "Such statement shall be prepared and certified to be true and correct by an independent certified public accountant." The hearing officer's ruling is contrary to Colorado law that admits evidence demonstrating the ambiguity of a seemingly unambiguous contract provision.
The hearing officer refused to consider the evidence of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frank M. Rosetto, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- USI Properties East, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Christmas v. CooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.