Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Coleman
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided April 10, 2009No. 2070959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Judge.
Arthur Haynes appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims against Ron Coleman alleging malicious prosecution and abuse of process. We affirm.
Haynes was employed as a public-school teacher in Mobile County. The Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County terminated Haynes’s employment, pursuant to § 16-24-9, Ala.Code 1975, a part of the Teacher Tenure Act, § 16-24-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. Pursuant to § 16-24-10, Ala.Code 1975, Haynes appealed his dismissal to a hearing officer, and, following a hearing, the hearing officer reinstated Haynes’s employment.
Haynes subsequently…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foster v. EmburgDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Foster v. EmburgDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
- Haynes v. ColemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Tunstall v. GlidewellDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2020