Haynes v. Coleman
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
30 So.3d 420 (2009)
Arthur HAYNES
v.
Ron COLEMAN.
2070959.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
April 10, 2009.
Rehearing Denied September 4, 2009.
Marcus E. McCrory, Mobile, for appellant.
Mark S. Boardman and Dana Bolden Hill of Boardman, Carr, Hutcheson & Bennett, P.C., Chelsea, for appellee.
BRYAN, Judge.
Arthur Haynes appeals from a judgment dismissing his claims against Ron Coleman alleging malicious prosecution and abuse of process. We affirm.
Haynes was employed as a public-school teacher in Mobile County. The Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County terminated Haynes's employment, pursuant…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Hardy v. VialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.