Legal Opinion
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Hicks
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 1931No. 2025PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.
We have stated as briefly as possible the various and involved steps relating to the making up of the issues insofar as germane to the narrow question presented to the court.
The testimony offered and accepted by the trial court was to the effect that the insured had been adjudged an insane person by the Probate Court of Franklin County on the 15th of May, 1928, and that continuously thereafter and at the time he was totally and permanently disabled and thereby prevented from pursuit of any mental or manual labor for compensation. The defense tendered the testimony of Dr. Tarbell to the effect…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Scarborough v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Repala v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Lee v. Southern Life Health Ins. Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Casey v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- National Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.