Ruth v. Lane
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bussey, Justice:
In this tort action plaintiff-respondent, alleging that he was severely burned as a result of the negligence of his employer, the defendant-appellant, obtained a jury verdict for actual damages amounting to $6,000.00. The appeal is from an order of the lower court denying defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and in the alternative for a new trial.
The defendant contends that he was entitled to a directed verdict because there was no reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence other than that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Hice v. Dobson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Barksdale v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998