Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Lane

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 14, 1970No. 19079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

In this tort action plaintiff-respondent, alleging that he was severely burned as a result of the negligence of his employer, the defendant-appellant, obtained a jury verdict for actual damages amounting to $6,000.00. The appeal is from an order of the lower court denying defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, and in the alternative for a new trial.

The defendant contends that he was entitled to a directed verdict because there was no reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence other than that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Hall v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Hice v. Dobson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Barksdale v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API