Legal Opinion
Nader v. Land
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2006No. 04-2428PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this declaratory action requesting that the court find that during the Presidential Election in 2004, the Michigan , Secretary of State had a duty to certify one faction of the Reform Party’s candidates for President. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and because Plaintiff Nader elected to appear on the ballot as an independent candidate. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the dismissal of election claims 1-5 and REVERSE the dismissal of causes of action 6 and 7.
B…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sam L. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Ruby H. Harris v. Reginald Callwood & Daisy CallwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Offill v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Easter v. Beacon Tri-State Staffing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Marcum v. DuchakDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Nader v. LandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006