Legal Opinion
Dunfee v. Finchum
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided September 21, 2015No. 3:13-CV-378-TAV-HBGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on defendants David Finchum, Rebecca Co-wan, and the City of Sevierville’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 41], and on plaintiff Zachary Allen Dunfee’s Motion to Alter or Amend Scheduling Order and for Leave to Amend Complaint [Doc. 56]. The parties have responded and replied to each of these motions [Docs. 52, 55, 58, 59, 60, 64]. Having reviewed the parties’ arguments, the record in this case, and rele*972vant law, the Court will deny plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend Scheduling Order and for Leave to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Copeland v. Zaitz (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Millhouse, II v. SeleshiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Wiley v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021