Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 13-25 re: Andrew J. Decker, III
Supreme Court of Florida
1ConcurrencePariente, J.
I agree with the majority that “Judge Decker’s misconduct unquestionably warrants the imposition of a serious sanction.” Majority op. at 307. I also agree with the increase of sanctions from the JQC’s recommended 90-day suspension without pay to a six-month suspension without pay. The increase in sanctions is appropriate given the seriousness of the multiple charges against Judge Decker, which would have warranted a rehabilitative suspension.9 As the JQC found, the “cumulative effect of these misdeeds coupled with the fact that Judge Decker had been reprimanded by [T]he Florida Bar in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- The Florida Bar v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 14-255 Re John C. MURPHYSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re Commission of Elected JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 2009