Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 13-25 re: Andrew J. Decker, III

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 2, 2017No. SC14-383Published

1ConcurrencePariente, J.

I agree with the majority that “Judge Decker’s misconduct unquestionably warrants the imposition of a serious sanction.” Majority op. at 307. I also agree with the increase of sanctions from the JQC’s recommended 90-day suspension without pay to a six-month suspension without pay. The increase in sanctions is appropriate given the seriousness of the multiple charges against Judge Decker, which would have warranted a rehabilitative suspension.9 As the JQC found, the “cumulative effect of these misdeeds coupled with the fact that Judge Decker had been reprimanded by [T]he Florida Bar in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. The Florida Bar v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 14-255 Re John C. MURPHYSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  4. Advisory Opinion to the Governor Re Commission of Elected JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API