Legal Opinion

Receiver v. Stanton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1894No. 112PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Third District, in an appeal from. Travis County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

In the year 1880 the East Line & Red River Railway Company, incorporated under the laws of Texas, in order to secure the payment of principal and interest of 1400 bonds for $1000 each, executed and delivered to the Fidelity Trust Company of New York, as trustee, a mortgage or deed of trust in which it conveyed to the said trustee, in trust, all of the property that it then owned or might thereafter acquire, covering all property of every kind; also “all the rents, issues, profits, tolls, and other incomes of said road.” The deed of trust contains the following clauses:

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lane v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Receivers v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Lyon-Gray Lumber Co. v. Gibraltar Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Orange Lumber Co. v. TooleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Sullivan County Railroad v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API