Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Millsap v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 23, 1988No. 70688PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This appeal involves the constitutional validity of article VI, sections 30(a) and 30(b) (collectively, “section 30”) of the Constitution of Missouri. We have exclusive jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, § 3.

Petitions1 to create a Board of Freeholders were filed with the election officials of St. Louis City and County. Following certification of the petitions, section 302 required both the mayor of St. Louis and the county supervisor of St. Louis County to appoint nine “electors” to the Board. In addition, the Governor of Missouri was required to appoint one elector to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Turner v. FoucheSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quinn v. MillsapSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Polk County Board of Supervisors v. Polk Commonwealth Charter CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Millsap v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. Caucus v. AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013
  5. Millsap v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API