Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Caucus v. Alabama

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 2, 2013No. Case Nos. 2:12-CV-691, 2:12-CV-1081Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, District Judge

I agree with the majority’s disposition of the First Amendment partisan gerrymandering claim and with much of its reasoning in support of that disposition. As for the one-person, one-vote claim, while I agree that the issue of justiciability has been properly raised by the court, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s dismissal of the claim on that ground. And, second, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s reasoning on the merits.

I. BACKGROUND

In Alabama, during each election for members of the State Legislature (the House of Representatives and Senate), when Alabamians cast a vote…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API