Legal Opinion

Stave v. Estate of Rutledge

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2005No. 04-847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Scott Stave, as Conservator of the Estate of Lenora Rutledge, appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decree of the District Court for the Twelfth Judicial District, Chouteau County, wherein the court concluded that Lenora was competent to effect the transactions about which Stave now complains. We affirm.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal: Did the District Court err in concluding that Lenora was competent to execute documents which affected the transactions at issue?

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Lenora brought this action in the District Court against her…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re the Marriage of MeaseMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Double AA Corp. v. Newland & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Pankratz Farms, Inc. v. PankratzMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Koerner v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Willis v. FerttererMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. R. TalksaboutMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wyo-Ben, Inc. v. BixbyMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. R. TalksaboutMontana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API