Legal Opinion

Nigg v. U.S. Postal Service

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 7, 2011No. SACV 03-01611-JVS (ANx)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (fid 9-2-11) and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (fid 9-2-11)

JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

Defendant United States Postal Service (“the Postal Service”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. - Plaintiffs Robert Nigg (“Nigg”) and Keith Lewis (“Lewis”), acting on behalf of current and former postal inspectors (collectively, “the Inspectors” or “Postal Inspectors”), cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
  5. Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cencarik v. Audubon Field Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
  2. Conklin v. The United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  3. Conner v. Professional Medical Billing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API