Legal Opinion

(PS) Coleman v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 6, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02677Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACQUELINE COLEMAN, No. 2:23-cv-02677-KJM-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jacqueline Coleman, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, seeks 18 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(authorizing the 19 commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable 20 to pay such fees). Plaintiff’s affidavit makes the required financial showing. Plaintiff’s motion to 21…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API