Legal Opinion

Dorrington v. Board of Supervisors

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902No. Civil No. 776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yuma. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The appellant petitioned the court below for a writ of mandamus to compel the appellee to audit and pay two demands against the county of Yuma,—one in the sum of nine, hundred and twenty dollars, alleged to be due him for salary at the rate of twenty dollars a month from the twenty-fourth day of March, 1895, to the twenty-fourth day of January, 1899, as a member of the territorial board of immigration commissioners of the territory of Arizona in and for the county of Yuma; the other in the sum of nine hundred and twenty dollars, alleged to be due him for and on behalf of moneys expended by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. County of GrahamArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API