Legal Opinion
Bowers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 16, 1953No. 11457_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
The indictment in this case was returned under 2 U.S.C.A. § 192, the pertinent part of which is as follows:
“Every person who having been summoned as a witness * * * to *448give testimony * * * upon any matter under inquiry before * * * any committee of either House of Congress * * * refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor * * (Emphasis added.)
The words of the statute which we have italicized were used advisedly, because Congress knew of course that in hearings before its committees the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Christoffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3Cited by43 opinions
- Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Louis Weinstock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Deutch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.