Legal Opinion

Bowers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 16, 1953No. 11457_1PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

The indictment in this case was returned under 2 U.S.C.A. § 192, the pertinent part of which is as follows:

“Every person who having been summoned as a witness * * * to *448give testimony * * * upon any matter under inquiry before * * * any committee of either House of Congress * * * refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor * * (Emphasis added.)

The words of the statute which we have italicized were used advisedly, because Congress knew of course that in hearings before its committees the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Christoffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Louis Weinstock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Deutch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API