Legal Opinion

Andrews v. People ex rel. Rumsey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John G-. Kogers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

The first position taken by appellants is, that the cost of the parks and boulevards, for which this assessment is levied, exceeds the limitation fixed by the statute.

The record shows that the assessment was made to pay damages for lands condemned........ $174,560 60

And to pay for lands purchased.............. 873,446 62

Making a total of......................$1,048,007 22

The limitation imposed by the 5th section of the original act was $900,000, exclusive of improvements (Private Laws of 1859, vol. 1, 345); but in a supplemental act, approved April 19j 1869) the 10th section declares* “For…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Miller v. BrislinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Hundley & Rees v. Commissioners of Lincoln ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Karnes v. People ex rel. RumseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Thatcher v. People ex rel. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Pearson v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weber v. TuckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Knowlton v. KnowltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. In re the StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API