Legal Opinion

Donna Teagardener v. Republic-Franklin Incorporated Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1990No. 89-3865PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, formerly members of the Republic-Franklin Incorporated Pension Plan (the Plan), sued the Plan and its administrators, William C. Cook, William W. Match-neer, and John P. Heller, Jr. (collectively, the Plan Administrators), to recover their proportionate shares of certain residual assets in the Plan. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of standing, finding that the plaintiffs were no longer “participants” or “beneficiaries” in the Plan, as those terms are defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), at the time the residual…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Billy Lamon Blackburn v. Fisk UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Melbourne E. Joseph, Sr. v. The New Orleans Electrical Pension & Retirement Plan, Individually and Its TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Robert Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Gasner v. County of DinwiddieDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  5. Raymond v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API