Commonwealth v. McKown
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
I respectfully concur in the result in what is the first case from this Court to address the right to bear arms since District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S.Ct. 2783, 171 L.Ed.2d 637 (2008). The majority holds that because Appellant did not possess a valid and lawfully issued New Hampshire license, he did not fulfill the requirements of 18 Pa.C.S. § 6106(b)(15). Because I consider that dispositive, I would not resolve Appellant’s other statutory arguments in support of his first issue, which I construe as dependent upon the existence of a valid…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Robertson v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Peterson v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Drake v. FilkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.