Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of Detroit

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2011No. 09-1640PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.

After protracted litigation over the United States’s condemnation of its property near the terminus of the Ambassador Bridge, the Detroit International Bridge Company appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for attorneys’ fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The district court held that International Bridge Company was not the prevailing party and, therefore, is not entitled to recover fees and costs. We AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

I

This controversy began in 1977 and several years ago we remarked that it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Luis Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America, upon relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.98 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Knox County, Tennessee, and Joyce Fritts, Trustee of the Joyce Fritts Family Trust, a Revocable Living TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API