Legal Opinion

United States v. Poindexter

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 1989No. Cr. 88-0080-01 (HHG)PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.

Defendant has filed a number of pretrial motions, the government has filed oppositions, and the Court has received replies and voluminous appendices. In general, the motions will be denied. Several of them are subject to denial on a fairly summary basis, either because Judge Gesell of this Court ruled on the issues adversely to defendant while the Poindexter matter was still pending before him, and the rulings are therefore the “law of the case,” 1 or because there is direct appellate precedent in point contrary to the position taken by defendant.

Notwith…

2Cases cited98 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. PassaroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. ClarridgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  4. United States v. JacksonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. United States v. BeckfordDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API