Legal Opinion

Rua v. Watson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. Hon. Joseph B. Moore, Judge, Action by Helga K. Rua against William A. Watson and Sol Rosenthal. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant.Rosenthal appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

This action to obtain a decree adjudging the defendant Rosenthal to be an involuntary trustee of certain undivided interests in seven contiguous mining, claims, and to require him to convey the same to plaintiff, resulted in the object sought, and defendant Rosenthal appeals from a judgment accordingly entered, and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial.

On the 18th day of November, 1895, respondent, being the owner of the property, conveyed the same, for a consideration of one dollar, expressed in the deed, to the defendant “William A. Watson, trustee,” and “to his heirs and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hart v. SeymourIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Brewster v. SimeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Dyett v. Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. La Crosse Boot & Shoe Manuf'g Co. v. Mons Anderson Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daily v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API