Legal Opinion

Clark v. Studebaker Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1929No. 9710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The chattel mortgage provides that upon default the mortgagee may take possession of the mortgaged car and sell it at public or private sale without notice and that the mortgagee may become the purchaser at such sale. The mortgaged property could therefore be properly sold at private sale if such sale was fair and reasonable.

*429Armstrong vs. McAlpin, 18 Ohio St., 184.

As there was evidence in the instant case tending to show that the agent of the mortgagee caused the mortgaged car to be repossessed and sold by the defendant under the circumstances narrated above and became the purchaser thereof…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Kellogg v. MalickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Porter v. Toledo Wimsett Finance & Thrift Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. City Loan & Savings Co. v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API