State v. Smelcer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We agree and reverse.
On September 2,1994, Officer Miller stopped defendant after seeing him drive erratically within the City of Pen-dleton. After defendant was stopped, he left his car and hollered, ‘Well, you got me. Let’s go.” Defendant was disheveled and unbalanced, and his actions were erratic. At trial, Miller testified that, based on his training and experience, defendant appeared to be under the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RaineyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ShunesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- McPike v. Enciso's Cocina Mejicana, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BeasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000