Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1953No. 651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.

Tbe chief question presented by tbe assignments of error is whether the trial judge erred in overruling the motion of the appellant for a compulsory nonsuit.

There was no direct evidence at the trial tending to connect Smith with the crimes alleged. The State undertook to establish complicity on his part by these circumstances:

• Wattlington, a participant in the crimes alleged, was accustomed to put paper bags containing lottery tickets behind a road sign and a sapling standing beside a public road in a rural district. At an early hour of the morning, Smith stopped his automobile at a point on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. Wilcox.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API