State v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
Tbe chief question presented by tbe assignments of error is whether the trial judge erred in overruling the motion of the appellant for a compulsory nonsuit.
There was no direct evidence at the trial tending to connect Smith with the crimes alleged. The State undertook to establish complicity on his part by these circumstances:
• Wattlington, a participant in the crimes alleged, was accustomed to put paper bags containing lottery tickets behind a road sign and a sapling standing beside a public road in a rural district. At an early hour of the morning, Smith stopped his automobile at a point on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. Wilcox.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StroupeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954