Legal Opinion
United States v. Prytz
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 27, 1993No. Crim. 2:92-593PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motions to dismiss and quash the indictment, and upon defendant’s motion to suppress evidence.
I. INDICTMENT
Defendant, Thomas A. Prytz (hereinafter “Prytz” or “defendant”), was indicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) & (b). The indictment states:
That on or about February 27,1992, in the District of South Carolina, the Defendant, THOMAS A. PRYTZ, knowingly received one video tape containing seven separate films which had been transported and shipped in commerce, said video tape containing visual depictions of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. James John DornhoferCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Albert A. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jerry Ted BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Clifford BurianCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. William Q. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.