Morgan v. Smith
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
There was evidence that the plaintiff, who was a workman in the employ of Flannagan, a carpenter, was, while in the exercise of due care on his part, injured by the negligent act of McCarthy, a mason in the employ of Smith, the defendant in the first case. Flannagan and Smith were engaged in repairing a building owned by Sears, the defendant in the second case. At the time of the accident the plaintiff and McCarthy were working together in putting in a ventilator on the roof. The justice who tried the case in the Superior Court ruled, at the close of the evidence, that there was no evidence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Slater v. . MersereauNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Killea v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Hasty v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Delory v. BlodgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.