Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1893PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

There was evidence that the plaintiff, who was a workman in the employ of Flannagan, a carpenter, was, while in the exercise of due care on his part, injured by the negligent act of McCarthy, a mason in the employ of Smith, the defendant in the first case. Flannagan and Smith were engaged in repairing a building owned by Sears, the defendant in the second case. At the time of the accident the plaintiff and McCarthy were working together in putting in a ventilator on the roof. The justice who tried the case in the Superior Court ruled, at the close of the evidence, that there was no evidence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  3. Slater v. . MersereauNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Killea v. FaxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  5. Hasty v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Delory v. BlodgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Kelly v. TyraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API