Legal Opinion

Jackson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2019No. 17-CF-943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fisher, Associate Judge:

*803 A jury found appellant Ronald Jackson guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon. The sole question before this court is whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence that appellant used PCP eighteen hours before the attack without any accompanying expert testimony enabling the jury to evaluate whether Jackson was under the influence of the drug at the time of the assault. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. Factual Background

Appellant Ronald Jackson and Desmon Beasley had been best friends for over forty years. In 2014, Jackson moved into…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Hunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API