In re Howard
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following his stipulation and execution of a Conditional Guilty Plea for Consent Judgment, the respondent, Phillip T. Howard, was publically reprimanded by the Supreme Court of Florida for violating Florida Bar Rules 4-3.4(g) and 4-3A(h).1 Respondent, who is also a member of the Bar of this court, failed to report his discipline to this court as required by D.C. Bar R XI, § 11(b), but it was reported to us by Bar Counsel who learned of it from the American Bar Association National Lawyer Regulatory Data Bank. Accordingly, on March 13, 2007, we directed the Board on Professional Responsibility…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AnyaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re ZukoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re PaulDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023