Legal Opinion

Freeman v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1990No. 89-194PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Petitioner, Karen A. Freeman, appeals from the denial of her claim for unemployment compensation benefits on the ground that the District of Columbia Department of Employment Services erred in finding that she had voluntarily quit her employment and, therefore, was not entitled to receive benefits under D.C.Code § 46-111(a) (1987). We hold that the agency’s interpretation of the voluntary quit provision of the statute is not unreasonable or contrary to law, and accordingly affirm.

I

Petitioner worked for the Grand Hyatt Hotel as a full-time banquet server until May 30, 1988,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gunty v. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Westwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Gopstein v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Weaver v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berkley v. D.C. Transit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Mcpherson v. StokesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Doyle v. NAI PERSONNEL, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Taylor v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API