Legal Opinion

In re Krasnow

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 10, 1948No. 5376PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner, rejecting claims 4, 5, 7,11,12,13, 21, and 22 of appellants’ application, serial No. 433.,212, for a patent, filed March 3, 1942, for a new and useful improvement in Badiant Energy Activation. Three claims were allowed.

The claims were rejected by the Primary Examiner for want of patentability over the following references.

Bender, 2,133,776, October 18, 1938.

Hassler, 2,197,453, April 16, 1940.

Buckley, 2,220,205, November 5, 1940.

Brons, 2,220,509, November 5, 1940.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of William G. Baird, Jr., Carl A. Lindstrom, Jr., Arthur L. Besse, Jr., and Donald J. D'EntrEmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  2. In Re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In Re Leigh R. AbtsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API