Legal Opinion

Weiker v. Motorists Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1998No. 96-2095PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue in this is case is whether a wrongful death beneficiary is precluded from underinsured motorist coverage because of her failure to notify her insurer of a proposed wrongful death settlement. Because we find that appellant did not violate the terms of her personal insurance policy, she is entitled to underinsured motorist coverage from her insurance provider.

Weiker’s personal automobile insurance policy with Motorists includes uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage provisions, including a subrogation clause, which state, “We will pay compensatory damages…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ramsey v. NeimanOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reinbolt v. GloorOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Martin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. Addington v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Estate of Taylor v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  5. Grabits v. Jack, Unpublished Decision (12-20-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API