Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1917No. 13879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mills, J., entered March 9, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing garnishment proceedings, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court discharging two writs of garnishment.

The facts are these: Some time during the month of March or April, 1914, Jay C. Allen, an attorney at law residing at Seattle, intending to be absent from the state a number of months, arranged with J. H. Allen to look after his law business during such absence. Jay C. Allen, at this time, and for some time prior thereto, was," and had been, an attorney for one John Joyce. Prior to July 6, 1914, there had been paid into the registry of the court the sum of $6,797.64 for the benefit of Joyce. On the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. SpencerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Carr v. BonthiusWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Eggleston v. SheldonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Calhoun v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Henry v. YostWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Teufel v. WienirWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Larson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lee v. WillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API