State v. Amaral
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtSweetland, C. J.
The case is before hs upon the respondent’s motion to establish the truth of exceptions alleged to have been taken by him at the trial of the above entitled indictment before a justice of the Superior Court sitting with a jury.
The respondent duly filed his bil¿ of exceptions in the Superior Court. Some of the exceptions stated in the bill were allowed, two were disallowed and a number were altered by the justice.
A determination of the motion involves a consideration of proper practice in the statement of exceptions in accordance with the statute and the decisions of this court, and the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DionneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- State v. QuattrocchiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- State v. FiguerasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- State v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- State v. LemmeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.