United States v. Boston & M. R.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the CourtDodge, District Judge
(charging jury). The statute which we are considering in this case is a statute passed by Congress under the power which is intrusted to Congress by the Constitution to regulate commerce between the several states. Congress makes this law in regulation of interstate commerce; it has the power to make such regulations. If we were dealing here with a railroad or a train whicli was not engaged in interstate commerce at all, this statute would not. apply. It does not seem to be disputed in this case that the defendant railroad, and the car with whicli you are concerned, were both engaged ill…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Baker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Mochel v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Oregon Short Line R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- International Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.