Legal Opinion
State v. Perry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 2009No. 08-1304PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
_[/The Defendant, Jermaine Perry, appeals his convictions and sentences of armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. We affirm.
ISSUES
We shall consider whether:(1) the evidence was sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt;(2) a Daubert hearing should have been conducted on the shirt and footprints; and,(3) the Defendant’s concurrent sentences of twenty-five years at hard labor for armed robbery and ten years at hard labor for conspiracy to commit armed robbery are excessive.
*344LAW AND DISCUSSION
A. Sufficiency of the Evidence
Armed Robbery
The analysis…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. MussallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. QuinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. TilleryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. GraceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. WestmorelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. HurstLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.