Legal Opinion
United Paperworkers International Union v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 31, 1992No. 5:92-cv-00087PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COFFRIN, Senior District Judge.
The United Paperworkers International Union and its Local No. 340, on behalf of members of the Local, (“plaintiffs”) bring this Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. sections 2101-2109, (“WARN Act”) action against Specialty Paperboard, Inc. (“SPI”) and Rock-Tenn Co. (“RTC”) (collectively “defendants”). Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs’ claims are time-barred. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
This matter is before us on defendants’ motion to dismiss;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cashman v. Dolce International/Hartford, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Gomez v. American Garment Finishers Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
- United Paperworkers International Union And Its Local 340 v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Kelly v. SabreTech Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1999
- United Paperworkers International Union & Its Local 340 v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993