Bemis Car Box Co. v. J. G. Brill Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; James B. Holland, Judge. Action at law by the Bemis Car Box Company against the J. G. Brill Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below the Bemis Car Box Company, owner of patent No. 239,702, issued April, 1881, to Sumner A. Bemis, for a car axle box, brought an action at law against the J. G. Brill Company to recover the alleged damages suffered by it through infringement of said patent. The case having proceeded to issue, it was by consent referred to a referee, who by stipulation was to—
“hear and determine the case and report his conclusions thereon to the court. His rulings on the admission or rejection of testimony and his findings of fact and .conclusions of law shall be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- The Suffolk Company v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Sylvania Industrial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.