Legal Opinion
ABB, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 10, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-138; Consol. Court No. 16-00054PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Mark A. Barnett, Judge
Barnett, Judge: ABB, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “ABB”) and Hyosung Corporation (“Hyosung”) each challenge certain aspects of the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) second administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea for the period of review (“POR”) August 1, 2013, to July 31, 2014 (“POR 2”).1 Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea, 81 Fed. Reg, 14,087 (Dep’t Commerce March 16, 2016) (final results of antidumping duty admin, review; 2013-2014) (“Final…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- ABB Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Hitachi Energy USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Hyundai Heavy Indus., Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- ABB Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Jindal Poly Films Limited of India v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.